The Nest

NestApple's Real Estate Blog

Featuring real estate articles and information to help real estate buyers and sellers. The Nest features writings from Georges Benoliel and other real estate professionals. Georges is the Co-Founder of NestApple and has been working as an active real estate investor for over a decade.

Seller financing in New York in 2023

Go Back To Previous Page

As a property owner, there comes a time to sell a property. You can sell a property the traditionalseller financing in nyc way and have the option of selling the property with owner financing. Let’s dive into the pros and cons of homeowner financing. We will help you determine whether or not it would benefit you. Home seller financing is a great way to end up in a poor house for both sellers and buyers. Buyers who need seller financing typically can’t qualify for a conventional mortgage, are not financially qualified, and can’t get FHA loans.

As a result, you can expect borrowers to default in an owner-financed deal more than 50% of the time. When a borrower defaults, massive costs will be associated with both parties. The borrower’s credit gets ruined, and the seller must deal with a messy and costly eviction process.

Owner financing, also called home seller financing, is when a property owner holds financing for the buyer instead of getting a bank loan. In most cases, the owner or seller of the property receives a down payment from the buyer. Both parties enter into a binding contract that outlines the financing arrangements, such as a promissory note and mortgage. These may include the interest rate, monthly payment amount, the parties’ responsibilities, and timeline to repay the loan amount.

Cons of an owner-financed mortgage

1) Get prepared for the buyer to default on the seller financing loan

There’s a reason banks won’t lend to a buyer who needs an owner-financed mortgage. The buyer might not have enough saved for a standardmortgage financed by the seller down payment (i.e., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 20% on a jumbo, non-conforming mortgage). Though that wouldn’t necessarily be bad if the buyer has a steady source of income.

For this reason, some sellers sometimes accept two offers in parallel: one can be with seller financing, and the other is more traditional.

However, it’s more likely that the buyer isn’t financially qualified even if they had the money for the down payment.

For instance, they have impaired credit reports and low credit scores.

More likely than not, the buyer doesn’t make enough income to cover anticipated housing expenses with a margin of safety sufficiently. For example, the maximum debt-to-income ratio allowed for a conforming home loan is 43%. Then, banks may have some flexibility for non-conforming jumbo loans.

More likely than not, the buyer doesn’t qualify for a regular mortgage, and they don’t make enough income to keep anticipated housing expenses under 40/50% of their total revenue. As a result, if you agree to finance their purchase when banks won’t, you’ll be much more likely to underwrite a non-creditworthy borrower.

Let’s be honest, why do you think you’ll do a better job vetting a potential borrower than the underwriting department at a major bank? So prepare yourself for default. We’ve heard statistics from lenders that owner-financed mortgages have a default rate of approximately 60%, and those trigger additional costs for sellers.

2) Foreclosure and eviction can take months

The borrower inevitably defaults on your seller-financed mortgage. You’ll have to spend an enormous time, money, and energy tomortgage contract foreclose on the property and evict the borrower. Remember that it’s illegal in many states to try to evict a tenant without a court order and a sheriff to do it.

The foreclosure and eviction process varies significantly between states, and the process can take months and even years in states like New York, with many tenant protections.

3) You may have to make significant repairs

Remember that you’ll receive zero rental income during all this time. Also, the tenant will most likely be tearing the place apart. If you have a poorly written loan agreement, the tenant might even strip your furnishings and appliances to sell spare pocket change.

As a result, once you’re finally able to recover your property and vacate the premises, you’ll most likely have to do some renovation work to restore it to its former condition. Even if you don’t have the money to restore the property to prime condition fully, you’ll still most likely need to do some basic repairs to increase your chances of marketing the property again for sale or rent.

4) You’ll have to try to sell all over again

This brings us to the last point. After all the stress and hassle of evicting the borrower and repairing your property, you’re back to square one with less money. You’ll have to spend money to market the property once more.

You must pay a new real estate broker commission to try selling again. Let’s say you give up and don’t try to sell again.

Seller closing costs are very high in NYC. Therefore, you’ll be lucky to break even despite getting some cash flow from the buyer’s 10% down payment.

Benefits of a seller-financed transaction

We believe agreeing to a seller-financed deal is a poor idea. However, there are some benefits and exceptions when it might make sense.Real Estate agents Make in NYC

1) When the bank won’t finance a property due to liens or violations

It might make sense for sellers to consider offering owner financing. If they know that banks will be loathed to lend against their property. The most common reasons are underlying issues with the property’s title, liens or judgments against the property, or violations.

For example, perhaps the owner installed a sauna illegally without getting the city’s proper permits. Or he has already gotten caught and received a violation by the NYC Department of Buildings.

Either situation might make the home unfinanceable for most traditional lenders’ loans, but the owner stepping in might be a great idea, and it expands the potential buyers.

Remember that contracts usually stipulate that properties are to be delivered free and clear of title and any violations, liens, or judgments. Therefore, some explaining and negotiation will be necessary if you wish for a buyer to purchase it anyway.

2) Seller financing expands the range of possible buyers for their home

Besides greatly expanding the possible range of buyers from offering to finance if banks won’t lend, buyers’ content extends even if banks lend. That’s because some buyers won’t qualify for a mortgage loan from a traditional bank lender.

Perhaps because they don’t meet various financial requirements such as post-closing liquidity, the minimum down payment, or the debt-to-income ratio. For instance, banks typically require six months, while co-op boards can require up to 1 or 2 years worth),

A great example is a high-income buyer who works at Google. Let’s say he’s a talented software programmer. He makes $2,000,000 a year with a Principal Engineer’s title (i.e., one of the highest ranks for an engineer at Google). However, for some reason, he doesn’t have a lot of savings, even though he makes a ton of income and has job security.

This buyer can only put down 10% and has no post-closing liquidity. Would it make sense for the seller to finance his purchase if banks don’t lend to him? Of course, it would!

3) Sellers can cash out by selling their loan to an investor

Don’t forget that just because you extend home seller financing to a buyer doesn’t mean you can’t still cash out. There are plenty of investors out there whorenting an apartment in NYC - broker showing an apartment to clients are willing to purchase mortgages and promissory notes on the secondary market. Of course, you’ll have to keep in mind that you’ll most likely be taking a haircut from the face value of the loan if you do sell to an investor.

The secondary market for one-off mortgages like this isn’t precisely liquid, and investors will look to make an excellent return for the additional risk involved. You can expect to receive offers for anywhere between 60% to 90% of the loan’s principal value from an investor.

4) Easy underwriting process and faster closing with seller financing

An often understated benefit of seller financing is the significantly quicker contract to the closing process. This may help you seal the deal with a buyer. You won’t have to wait for the bank’s conservative mortgage underwriting department to jump through its hoops and approval processes.

You can perform your expedited version of underwriting to ensure you’re comfortable with the risks involved. And as a result, you can choose a closing date significantly sooner.

5) Shorter loan terms structured with seller financing

Sellers do not need to grant a long-term mortgage like a traditional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage. Sellers can structure the note as a bridge loan to more conventional financing.

For example, sellers might structure a five or seven-year note with a balloon payment at the end of the term. The buyer intends to secure a traditional mortgage by that time.

6) Sellers can earn a higher return vs. banks

Sellers can typically expect to make a percentage point or two more than traditional mortgages’ market rate, and this is due to the irregularity and additional risk involved. Of course, all of this is negotiable.

Still, on average, and typically given the buyer’s lack of options, the seller can get away with charging a higher interest rate than a conventional mortgage.

Does seller financing count as an installment sale?

Yes, a deal where the seller provides owner financing to the buyer can be counted as an installment sale. This leads to favorable capital gains treatment. This can be useful to sellers who do not qualify or are over the limit for certain tax benefits associated with real estate sales. Those include the 1031 exchange for investors or IRC Section 121 for primary residences.

For example, an investor trying to sell a rental property may have missed the window to qualify for a 1031 exchange. This investor would therefore be subject to regular capital gains taxes.

To minimize those taxes, the investor could spread out the gains over more years via an installment sale.

This way, he qualifies for a lower tax bracket each year. A homeowner trying to sell a primary residence can benefit if they don’t prepare for IRC Section 121.

For example, this tax exemption for primary residence sales exempts up to $500,000 of capital gains for married filers and $250,000 for single filers. However, what if capital gains are significantly over the limit? In that case, deferring those capital gains over more years via an installment sale might make quite a bit of financial sense.

Another requirement of IRC Section 121 is that the homeowner must have lived in the home for at least 2 out of the past five years. What if the owner moved a few years ago and no longer qualified? Once again, an installment sale might help reduce the seller’s capital tax burden by spreading gains over more years in this white paper.

Written By: Georges Benoliel

Georges has been working in Wall Street for the last 16 years trading derivatives with hedge funds. He has been an active real estate investor for over a decade. Georges graduated from HEC Business School in Paris and holds a master in Finance from ESADE Barcelona.

RSS Feed