Featuring real estate articles and information to help real estate buyers and sellers. The Nest features writings from Georges Benoliel and other real estate professionals. Georges is the Co-Founder of NestApple and has been working as an active real estate investor for over a decade.
On June 24, 2021, a massive tragedy happened. A Surfside, Miami high-rise condominium tower partially collapsed. Strangely, the building was almost entirely leveled. Men, women, and children were under the rubble. Search efforts continued for over a week before rescuers declared any remaining people a lost cause in this Miami condo collapse. At the time of the writing of this article, the death toll had climbed to 95 people. This number includes an older couple and a 1-year-old baby. This Miami Beach condo building collapse was a tragedy.
No one ever expects to hear about a building collapse, especially in the United States. However, those who were insiders claimed that it was bound to happen. According to multiple people who helped run the condo, there were plenty of warning signs that something was wrong. Even meetings took place discussing the need to overhaul the condo.
Despite the warning signs, the HOA that ran the condominium nixed improvements that would have saved dozens of lives. When the Miami condo building collapsed, it became clear that those repairs were essential. This should be a teaching moment among condo buyers. Here’s what everyone should take away from this tragic outcome.
According to people in the condo, there were several visible problems with the condo tower. People noticed their homes had cracks along doorframes or near the ceiling. Some claimed that they also saw structural damage near the support beams.
Despite the visible issues, people still moved in. We could have avoided this Miami building collapse. If you notice structural problems in a condo, do not buy it. This is a sign that the condo needs renovations and that the HOA is actively ignoring it.
Co-ops and condos both have meetings to discuss significant repairs. The organization gets to vote on whether maintenance rates will rise to cover those costs. No one looks forward to these meetings, but they have to happen.
During mandated meetings, the price tag you hear may make you balk. Even so, it’s a low price if it’ll save your life.
In the Seaside condo, some inspections revealed a repair cost total of $9 million. This equated to about $100,000 or so per resident. Most people balked and hoped to put them off. So they did.
Then, the structure gave out before they could fix anything.
Here’s the kicker that stood out when people realized the damage. The firm that owned the Seaside tower, Champlain Towers, had meetings about the damage, and the meeting notes that the firm mentioned “extreme structural damage.”
Building laws show that extreme structural damage means the building is legally unliveable. People must not have lived in the building at all. And yet, they were. This was an egregious problem that people should have addressed before the Miami condo collapsed.
People who read the community meeting minutes might have moved out before killing them.
Nowhere in those documents was the damage labeled an “imminent danger.” They would have been legally obligated to evacuate if people saw it imminent. Sadly, most building inspectors avoid using the “imminent danger” phrase because of the extent of the damage it alludes to.
Even so, whenever you hear about cracking concrete slabs or structural damage, it’s best to treat it as an imminent danger; when your building isn’t structurally sound, your ability to judge when the building will break fades.
As a result, it’s never a good thing to assume you can kick maintenance down the line.
To Champlain’s credit, they eventually tried to solve some of the many issues that plagued the Seaside Tower. In June 2020, Champlain Tower South hired Morabito Consultants to fix several significant problems with the roof. The problem was that people had not completed the concrete repairs. Worse, this was a 40-year recertification project.
Though the roof was prone to leaking, it was not what needed repair. Owners should have addressed the concrete and structure damage first. And worse, it should have been done far earlier. This is another reason why delaying repairs should be a warning sign to potential buyers.
When building inspectors walked through the halls of the now-notorious Seaside condo, they saw problem after problem. It wasn’t just a leaky roof, nor was it just the concrete breaking away. There were chipped paints, the pool’s concrete, and parking garage issues. The list went on and on.
If you want to buy a condo or join a co-op, pay attention to the size and magnitude of the problems that the building had. The Seaside condo had dozens of issues and addressed very few until it was too late. The fact that there were so many should have raised klaxons among residents.
We expect Condos and co-ops to remain pristine simply because the HOA or managing company maintains them well. For the most part, this is an okay expectation to make. A typical condo or a regular co-op will have great amenities and a fleet of qualified people to maintain them.
Unfortunately, condos like Champlain tend to make the others look bad. A fair number of people invest in condos just because they want a steady income and do not want to pay the maintenance needed.
This is what happened with the condo owner here. You can’t ever be too careful because there are bad apples like that. We are having a house inspector show up before the purchase is smart.
The one thing that residents noted about their lives in the condo building is that they were aware that they were living in a poorly maintained building. The lousy maintenance record might have seemed like a nuisance back in the day, but the truth is that the slapshot work eventually added up.
Don’t overlook a dirty condo center or cracked sidewalks in the community areas. They often misrepresent more significant issues that people ignore, too.
The Champlain South Tower was a quasi-luxury tower that often prided itself on keeping things affordable for its clients. Unfortunately, that bargain price tag came with a huge caveat: maintenance fees were so low because they cut corners wherever possible.
This should remind people that price isn’t the only factor in real estate sales, and you have to ask what you’re getting for that money.
This level of neglect is an extreme case of corporate greed winning at the cost of innocent lives. While the residents may have had some control over the measures, the truth is that this was a case where minor problems were ignored until they were no longer negligible. This meant that people should have been firmer with their company, but instead, they may have put too much trust in them to do the right thing.
Lawsuits will happen now, but we’re sure they will not be the only ones. Residents have the right to sue HOAs and landlords over unsafe conditions. Now that this has happened, it’s likely that we will see a spate of suits throughout the country.
Atorod Azizinamini, Director of Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure, and Sustainability at Florida International University, said investigating the Champlain Towers South collapse would take time.
He said structural engineers would look at design plans, how the building was constructed, take samples of steel and concrete, look at signs of corrosion, the foundations, and if any unusual event occurred before the collapse.
Once they have the information, they can simulate different scenarios and pinpoint how the collapse occurred.
Federal investigators are at the site and working to find the cause of the collapse. Authorities are taking debris to a large warehouse for examination.
Earlier this year, the condominium association president warned residents that the damage in the parking area had gotten “significantly worse,” and repairs needed to the whole building had risen from US$9m to more than US$15m.
After several weeks of searching and waiting for news on victims identified from the Champlain Towers South condominium collapse in Surfside, South Florida, authorities accounted for all 242 people.
Architects of the Champlain Towers South built it on a reclaimed wetland in 1981. Most blocks along the coast and high-rise buildings elsewhere are built on pile foundations, using columns of concrete and steel to transfer the load of the building into the ground. A short distance away is Champlain Towers North, built to an almost identical design.